I
actively hate fishing. And the
outdoors. And nature in general, really. So I honestly did not have high hopes for
this film. Luckily, my opinion changed
pretty quickly. During the first scene, to
be precise. Murmurs of “Is that a young
Joseph Gordon-Levitt?” floated throughout the classroom. Indeed it was. Things were looking up for this movie
already. And then Brad Pitt came onscreen. I was sold.
While
the cast was spot-on, the true charm of this movie came from the characters
themselves. The film follows two very
different brothers who make their way through life together, forever bounded by
the river of their youth. Even though
they end up taking very divergent paths, their love for each other is always abundantly
apparent. Someone remarked in class that
the film was a little too anticlimactic for their tastes. But in my opinion, it didn’t really need a
climax. The point of the movie was not
to keep you at the edge of your seat.
The point was to tell a story, beautifully and honestly, about two men
and the seemingly average lives they lead.
But even an average life can become extraordinary if you look closely enough. Something that I thought was a very nice
touch was the Robert Redford voiceover where he played the elder Norman
reflecting back on his life and the people who made it worth living. The viewer gets to experience the events both
in the moment and in retrospect, which lends a unique perspective to the
narrative.
The
sibling dynamic between the two brothers was one of the most fascinating parts
of this movie. On one hand, you have
Paul, the wide-eyed, impetuous younger brother with a penchant for booze and
gambling. And then you have Norman, the
serious, level-headed professor with aspirations bigger than his sleepy Montana
hometown. Norman is the type of person
who can perfect a craft with a great deal of concentrated effort and
practice. Paul is the type to have an
inherent gift. I think even Norman
realized that his brother was a better fisherman than he, though I’m not sure
he would ever admit it. Paul was one
with the river. He was attuned to its
behavior in a way that Norman never really could be. Norman relied on intellect; Paul followed his
heart. Unfortunately, following his heart
and being ruled by emotion is what ends up getting Paul into trouble, and
ultimately leads to his untimely demise.
To be
honest, fly-fishing just seems like a recipe for disaster for the coordination-challenged,
such as myself. But I love how graceful
they made it appear in the film. And
furthermore, I love how they managed to reveal the characters’ emotions and
personalities by showing how each member of the family would act while fishing. You knew exactly how that person’s life was
going by the amount and type of fish he caught.
Perhaps
it is because fall break is approaching and I’m feeling sentimental about going
back to see my family, but something about this movie really hit home for me. Paul and Norman reminded me of me and my own
brother. When Norman went away to
college leaving Paul at home, I was reminded of the slight feeling of
abandonment that I myself experienced when my brother left home. Seeing the strong importance that the
Macleans placed on family made me feel guilty that I had been too busy to call
my mother for the past two and a half weeks.
Really, it just made me miss the old days when we were all together
still. By the end of the movie, I dare
say I got a little misty-eyed. But I
swear to god it was just allergies.